Skip to main content

The Dictionary of Corruption


I want to say a big thank you to everybody that came to my book launch last Thursday. My deepest regards to my close friends who supported me throughout the drafting of my 1st book.

The Dictionary of Corruption presents 270 words and expressions that are commonly used by citizens talking about political and business life issues.

Corrupt politicians, corrupt businesses, most of all, corrupt citizens. The words people use indicate deep and inherit characteristics, and at the same time, represent the lack of progressiveness in our society and sometimes economic backwardness.

Corruption is a social characteristic. It is neither good nor bad; it is a social phenomenon, and needs to be handled as such in order to be eradicated form political, business and everyday life.

Comments

  1. I have just purchased your book (λεξικό) and I am not sure what value it offers. Perhaps I was expecting an expose on corruption in the form presented in the introduction and the epilog. But that was my assumption and the book’s title clearly said λεξικό. Obviously it is a reference book and not a book one would read cover to cover. Returning to the question of value, if the intent was to educate the reader in the subtleties of corrupt communication (subculture perhaps) so that the reader can either participate in corrupt activities more effectively or somehow help him avoid some of the impacts of such activities, I don’t think it does neither. If the intent was to raise awareness, you are “beating a dead horse”, the population is acutely aware down to the least sophisticated of us. The only merit that I can derive is in the realm of entertainment reading but the format is hardly conducive to such reading. If your aspirations are to write a follow up, perhaps a traditional book format that exposes the magnitude of corruption in the country, its toll on productivity, creativity and the quality of life in general including some real life examples would be of real value. If it raises the consciousness level of at least a few people a notch, it could be a step towards a grass roots movement to eradicate an ethical -socio-economic disease that by all accounts afflicts our country.
    I was surprise though by the last statement in your blog entry: “Corruption … is neither good nor bad; it is a social phenomenon, and needs to be handled as such in order to be eradicated form political, business and everyday life”. If it is not bad why does it need to be eradicated? Obviously it is bad for all the reasons you outline in the introduction of your book and the reasons that Western Europe and North America over the years have dealt severe blows to corruption in government and business in general. I am not saying that counties in those regions have completely eradicated corruption but it is not endemic to the population in general – a college grad does not need to know a politician to get a job!
    Spiros Manolis
    Nafpaktos, Greece
    Email: spirocm@msn.com

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian elections, so what?

There has been so much press coverage on the fallout after the Iranian elections, and most of it coming from social media sources, YouTube, twitter, facebook, Blogs etc. What I don't understand is that: Did people in Iran just woke up to their reality? They are living in a totalitarian state, under the dictatorship of a religious figure (Ali Khamenei), citizens are afraid to talk openly, and always need to be anonymous in case someone from the state comes knocking at their door. So, did some people in Iran just woke up? Why did they have to wait for an election to protest and express their concerns? If the system is corrupt and biased towards the population now, then it must have been like this before the elections! I did also manage to watch some of the press conferences by the Iranian State representative, but I have not seen anything from the Mousavi campaign. Why doesn't the Mousavi campaign have a daily press briefing? Why doesn't Mousavi go on an Interview with a ...

Twitter mistakes in Political Communications

A recent tweet from President Obama... stated : President Obama urges Congress to pass the infrastructure section of the American Jobs Act now. Listen live: http://wh.gov/live I have seen this in many tweets from politicians that have communications staffers operate their Social Media presence. This tweet is absolutely wrong! Barack Obama says: "President Obama urges Congress..." instead of writing "I urge Congress..." the copywriter wrote a tweet as if he/she is writing on their personal account. Clearly a big Social Media mistake.. P.S. IAB!

John Kerry and Digital Diplomacy

John Kerry delivered his first remarks as the new U.S. Secretary of State. In his first speech at the State Department, he noted :  "...We get to talk about empowering people through our ideals, and through those ideals hopefully they can change their lives..." This is really important to underline;  given that public diplomacy now has a much more crucial role to play. In utilising new and social media, people now have the opportunity to engage through digital diplomacy.  As Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Tara Sonenshine has said :  "...we have to introduce more and more virtual exchanges and the use of social media particularly to reach young people where they are..." Secretary Kerry Tours the Ops Center Also, I came across a tweet from the State Department which informed that #SecKerry will be tweeting from the  +U.S. Department of State  twitter account . #SecKerry will start tweeting fr...